The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently
discussed the standard for whether payments made to vendors in the 90 days
prior to a bankruptcy filing are within the “ordinary course of business”
defense. In making that determination, courts look at the transactions
between the debtor and the creditor prior to the bankruptcy filing to set a
baseline for what the parties’ “ordinary course” dealings were.
Typically, courts use one of two methods to create a baseline. The first—the
average age method— calculates the average number of days payments were late to
determine which payments were within that “ordinary” range. The second
method creates an “ordinary” range using the minimum and maximum invoice ages
during the historical period prior to bankruptcy. The second approach—the
“total range method”—considers any payment made in the 90 days before
bankruptcy “ordinary” as long as it was paid anywhere within the minimum and
maximum number of days late during the history of the parties’ dealings. The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York discussed, and rejected, the total range method in In re Quebecor World (USA), Inc., 491
B.R. 379 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013)). Of
the two methods, the average-age method is more commonly used by courts.
Using the average-age method, the Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit broadened the window for which payments fall within the
“ordinary course.” In the case, the baseline for payments was between 16
to 28 days from the invoice with an average invoice age of 22 days. The
bankruptcy court below determined that payments more than 6 days from the
average were outside the ordinary course. The Court of Appeals added two
days on either side of the window to include all payments within 14 to 30 days
as ordinary course. The bankruptcy court’s approach only took 64% of the
historical payments into account. By broadening the window, the Circuit
Court included 88% of the historical payments. As a result, the ordinary
course defense dropped the preference liability from approximately $306,000 to
approximately $60,000. Jason Foods Inc. v. Unsecured Creditors’
Committee, Case No.
15-2356 (7th Cir. June 10, 2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment